Follow Us

Sunlight Foundation has had such an incredible journey from 2006 to now. Join us in celebrating eight years of success by viewing and sharing our interactive report, Milestones and Metamorphosis.

Help us build on our eight year        momentum!

Contribute before year's end:
Donate to Sunlight today!

Donate

No Country for Self-Funders

by
I wonder if folks at the @sunfoundation realize they're creating a system where only billionaires can get elected -- Patrick Ruffini

That was a tweet sent the way of the Sunlight Foundation yesterday by transparency friend Patrick Ruffini. The only possible explanation I have for it is that Ruffini is criticizing our position on the DISCLOSE Act. I'm assuming that this is some new argument by the money equals speech crowd that if corporations and unions, who couldn't advocate directly for the election or defeat of a lawmaker from between 1990 and 2010, suddenly found their new right to political spending tied up with disclosure requirements than non-billionaire candidates won't run because they can't afford to and so on and so on.

This is a terribly tired and poorly thought out argument. I expect better from the anti-DISCLOSE Act crowd.

From the point of view of Ruffini the period between 1990 and 2010, when direct corporate and union spending on electoral appeals was banned, must have been a far more draconian time than a potential future era where this advocacy is allowed but required to be disclosed. The suggestion that only billionaires can get elected implies that candidates will need to self-fund their campaigns. How did self-funders do in the elections during this most oppressed period?

(The most readily available data comes from the 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008 elections. We'll have to just look at those years for now. And by self-funder, I mean someone who contributed a substantial amount of their own money to their campaign.)

In 2002 three out of thirty-two self-funding candidates for Congress won election. That's a 9.37 percent success rate.

In 2004 a whopping one out of thirty self-funders won election to Congress. An even less impressive 3.33 percent success rate.

In 2006 five out of forty-two self-funders were elected. A more favorable 11.9 percent election rate.

The best year for self-funders by far was 2008 when eleven out of fifty-one won election. That's a 21.56 percent success rate.

Out of the past four elections only 13 percent of all self-funders were elected to Congress. None of them were billionaires.

I guess you don't have to be a billionaire to get elected. I don't think that the imposition of disclosure requirements on activity that was illegal for twenty years is going to change that.