Sunlight Foundation

Guess Who's Coming to TCamp12: The TCamp Scholars Edition

Guess Who’s Coming to TCamp12” is an mini-series we started to introduce some of the faces you'll see at TCamp, something we hope will be useful to attendees and non-attendees alike. This week, we’ve highlighted Ohio advocate, Beth Sebian and Transparency International Slovakia’s Matej Kurian. Today, we bring you a few of the TransparencyCamp Scholars.

The TransparencyCamp Scholarship program was started as part of our 2011 Camp. It’s an application driven process that provides partial travel stipends for folks from around the country (and the world) to come to Washington, DC to join us for Camp. This year, we accepted 10 Scholars -- a mix of long-time and first-time opengov activists, developers, journalists, and thinkers. Like last year, we’ll do a round-up of the full list of Scholars post-Camp, but first, here’s a sneak peek at these awesome peeps:

Yvette Cabrera

Berkeley, California


Currently, Yvette interns with the Oakland Food Policy Council, blogging on topics like aquaponics, food policy, interesting events, and supporting the Council’s efforts in building partnerships and identifying key regional allies and decision-makers.

Think food policy has nothing to do with transparency? Think again. From the data held by government agencies like EPA, FDA, and USDA to having access to the meetings and records of government boards charged with setting local policy, those invested in food distribution, quality, and regulation have plenty of concerns that overlap with us transparency geeks. When asked why Yvette in particular wants to come to TransparencyCamp, she answers:

I want to learn about building transparency in the government on a national and local level in order to create a food system that is healthy and just for everybody. Transparency to me means efficiency and increased citizen participation in decision-making, and I think that is the only logical way to improving the current food system that we have here in the U.S.
 

Nuno Moniz

Porto, Portugal


Nuno is a civic hacker whose interests in open civic data have led him to work on a variety of different projects. His first was to open up the Portuguese State Budget, making it available in JSON. Using this information and the Open Knowledge Foundation’s “Bubble Tree” (a way to display interactive visualizations of spending data), Nuno went on to create visualizations for both the Portuguese 2012 State Budget and the Azorean 2012 Autonomous Region Budget.

Currently, Nuno is sinking his teeth into the meat of Portuguese legislative data. “For the last 6 months (and for the next 6 months) I've been working on my Master's Thesis: in a nutshell, I'm transforming three years of Portuguese Legislation's .PDFs into open data.” Knowing that the TransparencyCamp community is full of civic hackers from all over the world who work on legislative data and others who can provide help insight on the use and governing of this information, Nuno hopes to lead a session at TCamp about his work:

"Opening the Portuguese Legislation: What useful information lies in the documents?" was the name of the session I proposed [on Google Moderator]. As I said before, I've been working for the last months on an open legislation project. The objective of this session, besides sharing the project, its development status, and the "bumps along the way", would be to think what more information lies in the legislation texts. Which and what entities are present in those texts? People, Organizations? What do we gain by processing, discovering and interlinking that information and not just publishing its text? How could mapping that information add more transparency in the legislative process? Questions for the debate, and at the end, I hope, new and better ideas. :)

Dan Schneiderman

Rochester, New York


Dan says that he got into the world of opengov-ery because of his “passion for playing with big data and seeing how it can be used to help people.” Building off his experience at TCamp 2011, he hopes that TCamp 2012 will be an opportunity to explore new possibilities for future projects and how he can become involved with the transparency movement after he graduates.

To kick off this exploration, Dan plans to brings to TCamp the fruits of an independent study of government data he’s been working on using the javascript library D3. His study mashes up information from Data.gov, the Open States API, and a large collection (340,000!) of tweets relating to Super Tuesday that he scraped. Want to learn more? Find Dan’s session at TransparencyCamp.

Join us at TransparencyCamp April 28th and 29th just outside of Washington, DC to meet Matej and other folks -- inside and out of government -- who are working to making our government more open, accountable, and transparent. Register today at http://transparencycamp.org -- and hurry! Space is limited.

Guess Who's Coming to TCamp12: The Beth Sebian Edition

The countdown is on. We’re less than two weeks away from TransparencyCamp and -- for the first time in TCamp’s young history -- we’re set to sell out! Consider what that means not just for TCamp, but for the opengov movement in general: For the first few years of its life, TransparencyCamp attracted about 100+ folks -- the major actors at the forefront of conceptualizing and paving the way for creating "open government". But the numbers are growing: Last year’s Camp had over 270 people in attendance. And this year? At the moment that I’m writing this post, we have over 324 people registered. More come in every day.

Although I think it’s significant to note the number of folks willing to travel and share and make it in person to an event like this -- because it does make a statement about the reach of the foundational ideas of TCamp -- rest assured: We won’t measure our success by the numbers, but rather, by the quality of the experience each individual has at Camp.

On that note, we’re starting the "Guess Who's Coming to TCamp12" mini-series to introduce some of the faces you'll see at TCamp, something we hope will be helpful for attendees and a neat window in the festivities for those of you who can’t make it.

Today, allow me to introduce Beth Sebian. Regular readers of our blog might be familiar with Beth’s premiere open government project: a transparency event held in Cleveland, OH last summer called the Transparency Action Plan (TAP) Summit. At this flagship event, Beth articulated her community’s interest in government reform as a desire for greater transparency and inspired local developer, Jeff Schuler, to become a “civic hacker” -- to turn his tech skills toward government data and to work with local government officials to help improve things from within. Here’s a few words from Beth about her TransparencyCamp 2011 experience and why she’s coming back this year:

Last year's TransparencyCamp was my first. Before I arrived, I did not know what to expect. I am always excited for a chance to share a room with other open gov advocates, but was not entirely sure how the Camp could be more than simply an energizing booster event that was big on feeling good but skimped on the actual details of effective advocacy.

Having attended, I can safely say that TransparencyCamp is building a movement for Open Gov that will change the world.

At TCamp, I connected with likeminded activists and transparency practitioners who shared their experiences of creating more open and transparent dialogue and decision-making in their communities. We shared stories, successes, tips and tricks in the spirit of helping each other be better prepared to help achieve our ambitious vision of truly transparent and accountable government.

By the time I pulled into my driveway after the 6 hour ride back to Cleveland from TransparencyCamp, I already had in mind a project for helping my local government be more open and transparent. Within three months, I organized a summit in my County focused on how citizens and the government could work together better. Over 200 activists and politicians attended the event as a chance to help usher in a new era of accountability and openness in northeast Ohio. The event sparked a redesign of our government's website, the launch of two community outreach projects, a public-gov mobile app project and a non-profit group committed to sustained and constructive public dialogue.

I am so excited to go back and share what I've learned in the past year and get ready for the next.

Join us at TransparencyCamp April 28th and 29th just outside of Washington, DC to meet Beth and other folks -- inside and out of government -- who are working to making our government more open, accountable, and transparent. Register today at http://transparencycamp.org -- and hurry! Space is limited.

Sunlight Weekly Roundup: "What’s happening in the government should be public..."

  • According to open government advocates, Maryland does not do a good enough job of making government information easy for citizens to find online on the state’s website. Despite Governor Martin O’Malley’s stated commitment to increasing Maryland’s digital transparency, these open government advocates claim O’Malley’s administration has lagged behind in making “raw data held by state agencies available to citizens who want to evaluate the performance of state government — and O’Malley’s administration — on their own.” David Moore, executive director of the open government advocacy group the Participatory Politics Foundation, maintains, “What’s happening in the government should be public. Transparency in the process increases trust among the wider percentage of citizens and when civic trust is built up, then there’s more engagement.” For the whole story, check out Brooke Auxier’s post on Maryland Reporter.
  • Thanks to South Carolina Representative Bill Taylor, the state’s Freedom of Information Act will soon be facing a revamp. Taylor’s bill passed through a House subcommittee allowing state and local entities to only charge copy fees for an FOIA request and disallows search fees for those requests. It also creates a time limit for a public body to provide information. Furthermore, public bodies may no longer charge fees for staffers’ time spent gathering and reproducing records. In the past, the Nerve  has alleged that loopholes in the  FOI law  have allowed state agencies to “charge fees in the hundreds of dollars to fulfill a single request. Other loopholes allow a public body to simply acknowledge that it has received an FOIA request within the state’s 15-working-day time limit butnot actually fufill the request until months later.” “Right now, I wonder if ‘FOI’ shouldn't stand for ‘frustration of getting information’ act. We need a time barrier in here,” maintains Taylor. For the whole story, read Amit Kuma's post on the Nerve Blog. 

  • According to Ohio blogger Al Cross, public notices (or “legal ads”) not only help journalists report stories, but they also serve as a pillar of government transparency. Cross maintains, “Public notices are a necessary leg of the three-legged stool of open government, along with open-records and open-meetings laws.”  These public notices can include information about  government budgets, financial statements, audits, local ordinances, hearings, environmental permit applications, water-system reports, foreclosure sales and more. Cross worries  that public notices are under threat because  “local governments are lobbying state legislatures to eliminate or reduce newspaper publication of legal notices, arguing that it would be much cheaper for taxpayers if they’re published on government websites, and just as effective.” Polls by the Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute at the University of Missouri have found that citizens are unlikely to surf government websites for public notices. For his entire take, read Cross' post on the Ohio Newspaper Association Blog. 
  • This week, Hartford Superintendent of Schools Christina Kishimoto decided to bar the  media from  school board meeting about pending school leadership changes. According to Connecticut's Freedom of Information law, these meetings are supposed to be open to the public. In his post for CT Confidential, Rick Green argues, “ The point is not whether Kishimoto’s lawyers can find legal justification for blocking reporters from a discussion about taxpayer financed schools. The point is that school government and school decision-making should be done in the open and not in secret. Public employees like Kishimoto should want as much open government as possible if they want parents, city residents and the state taxpayers to support the high-cost experiment going on in the city.”
Connect with other transparency bloggers in this Transparency Bloggers Google group   and see what others are doing in the transparency movement by joining this Citizens for Open Government Google Group.

Ohio's latest law could keep controversial public records in the dark

Earlier this month, Ohio Governor John Kasich, signed into law a bill that will greatly reduce the penalties for unlawful destruction of public records. Sandwiched in the budget amendment bill, and likened to SB 178, the bill sets a $10,000 limit per case in fines that a given agency can pay for destroying public records.

Before the amendment, the state’s Public Records Act prohibited anyone from removing, destroying or mutilating all records because they were the property of the Public Office ( Sec. 149.351.)

The implications of this bill are two fold:

1. Agencies now have leeway to burn or shred public records that they consider either controversial or unfit for the public to see. As long as they can pay the $10,000 fine, then they are good to go.

2. While advocates for this bill believe that it will stop people requesting documents they do not need (especially after they have been destroyed) only to turn around and sue for large amounts of money, opponents feel that the $10,000 cap on lawyers fees will prevent most Ohioans from suing agencies that destroy public records. Several transparency supporters, including newspaper publishers and environmentalists, believe that this is a direct attack on open government.

The Ohio newspaper Association, Ohio Environmental Council, Ohio Association for Justice and the Ohio Employment Lawyers have all signed a joint testimony calling on the Governor to remove the amendment to the Public Records Act from the budget bill. (See joint testimony at the bottom.)

Ohioans are also showing their displeasure in the study: A Quinnipiac University poll released this week shows that 50% of registered voters disapprove of the way the governor is conducting his work.

Ohioans and others dissatisfied with their governor’s commitment to transparency legislation (or, at the very least, their commitment to not signing into law legislation that will directly inhibit transparency) can take action against these kinds of transparency rollbacks. Our campaign to tell our governors not to roll back on transparency now has a tool that makes it easy for you to call your governor’s office and tell them that open government issues -- like public records laws, financial disclosure, and open data -- are important to you. If you don’t tell your elected officials that these issues matter, then anti-transparency measures like Governor Kaisch’s signing of SB 178 will be norm.

Make the call and let us know how it went. By continuing to track our governors’ actions, we ensure that their campaign promises of being transparent are not just promises, but actions they can be accountable for.

P.S. For those of you following our trip to Utah to visit the National Governors Association (NGA), we should note that Governor Kaisch recently opted out of the NGA because he did not feel like it was “worth the amount of money to be [a] member.”

Look for more coverage of our trip this week!

Ohio Public Records HB153 Testimony

Local Spotlight

In honor of  Tax Day Ohio's Jason Hart took a look at salary information for Franklin County's administrators, specifically looking at raises over the past three years.  He got some interesting results -- most places the highest level people didn't get raises except for one department.

Friday, April 9th is Tax Freedom Day, when the average American has earned enough to pay Uncle Sam and Uncle Sam’s various relatives what they demand. Ohio is somehow a day ahead of the average, so in honor of the big day tomorrow I thought I’d dig through some salary info for public administrators here in Franklin County. As boring as I am, I ought to make an effort to avoid any talk of numbers or statistics. As stubborn as I am, I won’t!

With employment and the economy in general down for the past year and a half, I wanted to see how the smallest of government big-shots were rewarding themselves relative to 2007 and 2008. Despite widespread populist railing against private industry salaries and bonuses, I expected to see pay increases for the insulated local bureaucrats our tax dollars keep employed. Given some of the things I’ve read recently, I was pleasantly surprised by the data.

A helpful CPA in the Franklin County Auditor’s office responded to my public records request promptly, with salary data on all Franklin County employees from 2007-2010. Download the Excel file if you’d like to check my numbers or do some analysis of your own. I’ll list hourly rates instead of annual salaries, as 2009 contained 27 pay periods instead of the usual 26. Let’s start with the highest branch on the Franklin County tree, shall we?

Read the rest here.

This is a really fascinating use of data and another reason why we can all benefit from continuing to demand that all kinds of information be made available online.  Information than can empower people to find the right questions to ask their government.

Local Spotlight

Three bloggers have some interesting stories about their Freedom of Information (FOIA) escapades.

In Kentucky, Page One has a post about the State Treasurer withholding public records.

On August 27 I filed an open records request for the following:

  • All time sheets, calendars and schedules for State Treasurer Todd Hollenbach from the first date of his official service as Treasurer to present day
  • Security camera footage from front entrance that would provide visual confirmation of arrival and departure of Todd Hollenbach from the first date of his service as Treasurer to current

On September 3 I received a letter from Deputy State Treasurer Mary John Celleti:

The Kentucky State Treasury is in receipt of your Open Records Request seeking copies regarding:

  1. All time sheets, calendars and schedules for State Treasurer Todd Hollenbach
  2. Security camera footage from the front entrance, confirming Treasurer Hollenbach’s arrival and departure.

Please be advised that the Treasury is in the process of filling said request and it may take some time to gather and review all the requested information. Due to the expansive nature of the security camera footage the request may be expected to take more than ten days. Once the documentation has been gathered and reviewed, it will be made available to you. If you have any questions, please feel free to call

It’s now been a month since I filed the request, so I decided to poke around a bit. Low and behold, with the help of great sources, I’ve learned that Todd Hollenbach and his henchman are trying to prevent access to the requested documents. Documents and media which, according to four people in the office of the Treasurer, prove that: Todd Hollenbach barely ever shows up for work, spends most days at a country club and goes out of his way to do absolutely nothing. So you know he’s got something to hide.

This is a pretty harsh claim but the point should be clear.  ANSWER YOUR FOIA REQUESTS!  By deciding to not disclose lawmakers hurt themselves in the public eye.  Then they have to deal with sharp bloggers picking on them.

In Arizona, Expresso Pundit has a post also about withholding public records and how a Councilman helped him get the records he wanted.

Surely you recall the Desert Divas. That's the ultra expensive VIP Prostitution ring that police busted last year.

Back in February, it looked like the case was going to break wide open...Prosecutors were naming names

Today, Phoenix police offered to the media a list of thousands of names in two hefty PDF documents.

Unfortunately, the list was a bust...so to speak. Prosecutors did indeed name names, but they didn't provide addresses. That meant that none of us had any idea if "John Smith" was THE John Smith that you know from the office, or tennis, or church. Without the addresses, the list was essentially meaningless.

So I went to Phoenix Police and said I wanted the whole list....you could hear the laughter from quite a distance. Every media outlet in the state wanted the full list and Phoenix PD wasn't going to provide it.

I pointed out that the clients on the list were neither victims or witnesses and that the record was obviously public.

The Phoenix PIO who called back, said simply, "Good Luck".

After a few months of dead ends, I finally went to my Secret Weapon--Sal DiCiccio. Councilman DiCiccio thinks that if information is public that it should actually be available to...you know...the public. DiCiccio sent his right hand guy, former Tribune writer Hal DeKeyser to take care of it and by golly, they stone walled him too...but persistence pays off.

I got a call last week that the list was available on CD. Well, you are the public too, So here's your copy.

It is great to see an elected official so committed to freedom of information that they will get the information for citizens. Also thanks Expresso Pundit for posting the results online so others can find it.

In Ohio, River Vices submitted a FOIA request and got a unique response.

Under Ohio's Open Public Records Law, I am requesting a copy of the written agreement between the city and the Portsmouth Kiwanis Club for a playground in Tracy Park. A week ago, on Sept. 18th, 2009, at a public meeting in Tracy Park,in response to a question, Rick Morgan of Kiwanis publicly acknowledged that such a written agreement existed, but neither he nor you have yet made that agreement public. Please notify me by email when I can pick up a copy of that agreement.

Thank you.

Robert Forrey


Per your public records request;

You are correct in stating that at the meeting in the park the fact was "acknowledged that such a written agreement existed". What I don't understand is why you feel that a confirmation of this fact would necessitate a publication or distribution of the mentioned document.

As you requested, a copy of the document has been prepared for you to pick up at my office. Our regular office hours are from 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM, Monday through Friday.

If there is anything else that I can do for you, which is required by law, don't hesitate to call my office. If it isn't required by law then don't bother asking, because I think that you're a worthless piece of st and I wouldn't ps on you if you were on fire (my opinion). You're a poor, lonely, jealous, old man with aspirations of being a writer. You write your lies and uneducated opinions on people and issues from behind the safety of your slobber stained keyboard with the hope that somebody will read them that doesn't know you and believe that you're more than the pitiful, broke-down, lizard-looking thing that you are, in my opinion. Get a life old man. On second thought, don't bother..............

I do have a question for you. Do you have family and if so do they even like you?

Looking forward to your next Internet issue of "FORREY'S FOLLIES".....NOOOTTTTTT

With little respect for you, Mayor James D. Kalb

Now that's freedom of speech at its best, in my opinion.

The mayor of of Portsmouth does get points for answering the FOIA but it seems that he might want to work on his prose.

Local Sunlight: April 24, 2009

Every week I climb into the depths of the local political blogosphere to find the Sunlight. I use this series to highlight local blogs that do a great job of covering local, state, and congressional political news.  This week I have highlights from New York, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania and Illinois.

Rochester Turning in New York, has a post about former Congressman Tom Reynolds getting hired at a law firm.  Even though Reynolds isn’t a lawyer he was hired for the firms “Government Relations and Public Policy practice.”  Interestingly that sounds like lobbyist.   Good to see the revolving door in full swing.

In Ohio, Thurber's Thoughts has a post  about the mayor of Toledo, Carty Finkbeiner, not respecting open records laws. The post is about how several people have attempted to get information about various issues and their requests not being met.  The author is more outraged at the local paper for not catching on to the lack of openness until they wanted something.

Pennsyvania's Policy Blog talks about the cost of spending databases. The price for an online spending database is apparently not as high a barrier as some public officials thought.

In Illinois, Disarranging Mine about dealing locally with the lobbyists restrictions in the recovery bill. The story of how the lobbyist restrictions are being played out at the local level is pretty interesting.  I think the question is, if there is government money to be spent and there is no lobbyist there to hear about it does it get spent?

Advance Indiana about the new laws of lobbying disclosure just passed by the Indianapolis city council.  Apparently the definition of lobbying does not include entities looking for government contracts or grants.  Interesting.

Map the Mess

A group of citizen journalists in the Cleveland metro, so outraged by corruption within their local government, have taken matters into their own hands. Working in conjunction with local investigative journalism efforts, they've launched Map the Mess, a grassroots effort to shed light on the workings of business and government in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. They use social networking maps to reveal connections in government and to illustrations of how public officials conduct business in the county. They hope that the site provides enough transparency to the local government as to change the pattern of "patronage and privilege that frustrates reform and productivity." Here's an example of a map the folks at MtM created showing the various connections of local officials.

The site includes forums that explore such topics as the hidden connections that drive major public projects, rumors spawned by press coverage of local controversies, and isolated facts that might fit into a larger story or pattern.

This is really neat. I imagine we'll see more local transparency groups like MtM across the country.

Local Sunlight

Every week I climb into the depths of the local political blogosphere to find the Sunlight. I use this series to highlight local blogs that do a great job of covering local, state, and Congressional political news. This week I have highlights from Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Texas.

In Ohio, Writes Like She Talks highlights the House Education and Labor’s Committee’s new blog the EdLabor Journal.

In Pennsylvania, PolicyBlog and Keystone Politics points out Pennsylvania’s new state contracts database. Rhode Island’s Twelfth talks about the Governor’s veto of a bill that would have broadened the open records laws in Rhode Island. She also describes the procedure to get local records in Middletown and Newport, RI. Apparently in Middletown, the "Council has knowledge and access to ANY public records that you requested & would know that you requested it." It seems Rhode Island has a lot of work to do in the open records realm.

South Texas Chisme talks about a Californian man who is filing ethics complaints with Texas ethics commission because he has been going through campaign finance reports.

Local Sunlight

Every week I climb into the depths of the local political blogosphere to find the Sunlight. I use this series to highlight local blogs that do a great job of covering local, state, and Congressional political news. This week I have highlights from Ohio, South Carolina, Michigan, Missouri, and New Jersey.


Read more
« Previous
1 2