White House

 

How Unique is the New U.S. Open Data Policy?

The White House’s new Executive Order may be significantly different than the open data policies that have come before it on the federal level, but where does it stand in a global -- and local -- context?

Many folks have already jumped at the chance to compare this new US executive order and the new policies that accompany it to a similar public letter issued by UK Prime Minister David Cameron in 2010, but little attention has been paid to one of the new policy’s most substantial provisions: the creation of a public listing of agency data based on an internal audits of information holdings. As administrative as this provision might sound, the creation of this listing (and the accompanying scoping of what information isn’t yet public, but could be released) is part of the next evolution of open data policies (and something Sunlight has long called for as a best practice).

So does this policy put the U.S. on the leading edge?

Read more

Three Ideas to Open the Executive Branch

Tonight, President Obama will deliver the State of the Union Address to Congress. He is expected to urge the Legislative branch to take action on guns, immigration, climate change and a laundry list of other issues. In order to make progress on the major questions of the day, the President will have to negotiate and compromise with Congress. But, that doesn't mean he can't make progress through other means.

A few weeks ago, the Advisory Committee on Transparency heard three ideas that President Obama could consider implementing right away to make the Executive branch more open and transparent. Read on for the videos.

Read more

Transparency and the Obama presidency: Looking Back and Looking Forward – Video and Event Recap

How transparent has President Barack Obama's administration been? While the first term seemed to start with several bold initiatives, members of the transparency community have been disappointed with the apparent lack of initiative since then. Panelists gave the administration mixed reviews at the Dec. 3, 2012 Advisory Committee on Transparency event examining what's happened over the past four years and what in store for the next four.

Participants in the panel discussion, moderated by Daniel Schuman, policy counsel at the Sunlight Foundation and director of the Advisory Committee on Transparency, had a hard time listing the Obama administration's accomplishments without mentioning caveats in the same breath. Anne Weismann, chief counsel at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said the administration's efforts may have been well intended but were not always well executed. The decision to release the White House visitor logs, for example, resulted in more transparency about who is trying to influence the executive branch, but also resulted in some staff taking meetings to coffee shops.

Read more

Sunlight's Priorities for the Next Administration

Regardless of who wins the presidential election, the next administration will have enormous power to say how open our government will be. We have organized our priorities for the next administration below, to share where we think our work on executive branch issues will be focused, in advance of the election results. From money in politics to open data, spending, and freedom of information, we'll be working to open up the Executive Branch.

We'd love to hear any suggestions you might have for Sunlight's Executive Branch work, please leave additional ideas in the comments below.

(We'll also be sharing other recommendations soon, including a legislative agenda for the 113th Congress, and a suite of reform proposals for the House and Senate rules packages.)

Sunlight Reform Agenda for the Next Administration:

Read more

The News Without Transparency: Obama White House Releases Digital Staff Salary Report

A number of news outlets, including the National Journal and Reuters, reported on the White House’s release of its 2011 staff salaries report.

In addition to an analysis of who gets paid what, the news reports highlighted the fact that the reports are now provided digitally.

 The White House has been required to submit a report to Congress disclosing the names, titles, and salaries of employees of the executive branch since 1995. However, President Obama has been the first to release these reports online, making the information searchable and downloadable.
In prior administrations the information was only provided in hard copy to Congress and journalists had to contact congressional staffers to request copies of the reports. Some journalists, such as Dan Froomkin of the Washington Post, would obtain the reports then publish them online for public use. Because the reports are digital now, they are much easier for reporters and citizens to access.
The introduction to the 2011 report says the new practice is “consistent with President Obama's commitment to transparency.” Using the data from the report, Reuters and National Journal reported that in 2011 the total bill for staff at the White House came in at $37,121,463, which paid for 454 employees. Three policy advisors have a salary of zero, while 21 earn the highest salary possible, $172,200. The average staff salary was $82,000.

These staff salary reports are valuable oversight tools, but they do not include information such as assets, gifts, or travel payment. For top level executive branch staff, that information is available in the staff personal financial disclosures, which are available upon request through an online portal created by the Obama Administration. While lower level staff do submit reports as well, these are not publicly available.


"The News Without Transparency" shows you what the news would look like without public access to information. Laws and regulations that force the government to make the data it has publicly available are absolutely vital, along with services that take that raw data and make it easy for reporters to write sentences like the ones we've redacted in the piece above. If you have an article you'd like us to put through the redaction machine, please send us an email at mbuck@sunlightfoundation.com.

Keeping Track of Federal Agencies

The Unified Agenda, a list of all the rules federal agencies expect to issue in the upcoming year, was published online this past spring in a new format, in accordance to a new White House directive.

We reviewed the Agenda to identify steps each executive branch agency is taking to promote transparency, and the status of the action.

Department of Defense:

  • Cost and Software Data Reporting - This rule amended the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to address requirements for DoD contractors to establish and maintain a cost and software data reporting process under contracts for major defense acquisition - Final Rule, 11/24/10.
  • Freedom of Information Act Program Regulation: To ensure appropriate agency disclosure - Final Action proposed for 6/11 (no action taken since 2010).
  • Government Support Contractor Access to Technical Data: certain types of Government support contractors to have access to proprietary technical data belonging to prime contractors and other third parties, provided that the technical data owner may require the support contractor to execute a non-disclosure agreement having certain restrictions and remedies - Interim Rule, Comments Due by 5/2/11, Final Action proposed for 8/11.
  • Electronic Order Procedures - DOD makes orders available online so that contracts can be issued in an electronic format. Reports must be filed in an electronic format. Final Rule, effective 5/5/11.

Department of Energy:

  • Freedom of Information Act Regulations - DOE is revising its FOIA regulations to reflect current procedures for processing requests for information that are submitted to the Agency, to ensure compliance with the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996, and to make the regulation more user friendly. - Proposed for 6/11, no action taken since 2008.

Department of Health and Human Services:

  • Third Party Auditing - FDA will allow third party entities to conduct food safety audits. The regulation attempts to include protections for disclosure of conflicts of interest when third party entities review third party companies - Proposed Rule Stage
  • Transparency Reporting - health insurance plans will be required to make information on claims payment policies, the number of claims denied, data on rating practices and other information as determined by the Secretary available to the public, per regulations in the Affordable Health Care Act - Proposed Rule Stage

Department of Homeland Security:

  • Self imposed restrictions on lobbying - Establishes procedures concerning general prohibitions on lobbying and the use of certain appropriated funds, and the appropriate penalties for violations of those prohibitions. The purpose of the procedures is to ensure that neither the recipients of appropriated funds, nor the employees of DHS inappropriately solicit for action by the Congress. - No final rule issued, comment period closed in 2003.
  • Supplementary Ethical Standards - Two significant areas to be addressed by the supplemental regulation are outside employment and the prohibited purchase of Government-owned, seized, or forfeited property by DHS employees. - Notice of Proposed Rulemaking last issued 12/10.
  • Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Procedures - This action will amend FOIA regulations including provisions governing information subject to Privacy Act exemptions and procedures for verification of the identity persons under the Privacy Act. - No action taken since 2003.

Department of Justice

Department of Labor

  • Whistleblower Protections - OSHA will establish protections, burdens of proof, and standard practices and protections for whistleblowers according to new authority in Dodd/Frank bill - Final Rule-making Stage, 9/11.
  • Right to Know under Fair Labor Standards Act - Will update the record-keeping regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act in order to enhance the transparency and disclosure to workers of their status - Proposed Rule Stage 10/11.
Read more

Tell The WH How To Improve the Gov'ts Web Presence

Today at 4pm, the White House will host an online chat on how to improve the online experience with Federal websites. Although the event is being framed as a way to cut wasteful websites, it presents an opportunity to give useful feedback on what the government should be doing better online. The right people will be on the other end of the line: White House Director of Digital Strategy Macon Phillips, Federal Chief Information Officer Vivek Kundra, and Director of the GSA’s Center for Excellence in Digital Government Sheila Campbell.

There are some questions that we'd like answered:

  • Why isn't more government data being published online automatically?
  • Why aren't there more APIs?
  • Why isn't more data available in bulk?
  • What's being done to improve the quality of information published online, particularly with datasets?
  • Why do so many government websites look like they were designed in the mid-90s, and what's being done to improve the user experience?
  • What's next for the Open Government Directive?
  • Where's all that lobbying and ethics information the president promised would be online?
  • If this effort is about cutting websites, what's being done to make sure that public information isn't taken offline?

You can ask your questions by filling out a form on WhiteHouse.gov, tweeting with the #dotgov hashtag, or going to the WH facebook page.

You can watch the chat at WhiteHouse.gov or using the WH facebook app at 4pm.

Update: Video from the chat is now available here.

Bidding Farewell to Federal CIO Vivek Kundra

Today, the White House announced that Vivek Kundra, the country's first federal Chief Information Officer, is leaving later this summer to serve as a joint fellow at Harvard University's Kennedy School and the Berkman Center for Internet and Society. We're sad to see him go and urge President Obama to choose a successor who will carry out Vivek's vision of using the Internet to create a more transparent government.

Perhaps Vivek's biggest accomplishment was to strengthen OMB's role as a publisher of government data. While OMB is still largely unwilling to force agencies to share more information, Vivek built Data.gov and the IT Dashboard as tools to aggressively pursue transparency that affects how the government works.

Unfortunately, most of the work he started is also at risk of ending abruptly. With the electronic government fund being cut, and Congress hesitant to codify important transparency requirements, we risk seeing Vivek's successes become temporary gains. That's why we're hoping the White House chooses a successor for his position who shares his belief that technology can be used to change government for the better, by making it more transparent and accountable.

White House Establishes Government Accountability and Transparency Board

It's been a busy day for transparency initiatives. This morning President Obama issued an executive order which will create an 11-member board led by Vice President Biden to oversee the reporting of all federal spending data. It is modeled on the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board and similar in aims to a board proposed in the DATA Act of 2011, also introduced this morning.

We'll have more on this from our policy experts later, but for now you can read the executive order below.

Executive Order--Delivering an Efficient, Effective, And Accountable Government

The DATA Act of 2011: Rep. Issa Introduces Major Federal Spending Transparency Legislation

This morning, Rep. Darrell Issa introduced a major transparency bill that would transform how we track federal spending and identify waste, fraud, and abuse. The Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2011 would establish an independent body to track all federal spending on a single website and require the the use of consistent government-wide data standards.

The DATA Act would build upon the successes of USASpending.gov and the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board -- the independent body that reports upon recovery spending -- by creating a board responsible for publishing and monitoring all federal spending, to be known as the Federal Accountability and Spending Transparency Board. The FAST Board would oversee a successor website to USASpending.gov, which currently tracks all federal spending, but contains nearly $1.3 trillion in spending discrepancies that we identified as part of our Clearspending project.

While the creation of the FAST Board will garner the lion’s share of attention, the effort to create government-wide financial data reporting standards should not be overlooked. It will have a tremendous effect on public participation and oversight by empowering the American people to look at the data themselves. Indeed, Sunlight supports legislation, the Public Online Information Act, that promotes the creation of government-wide data standards and sets up an entity with similar responsibilities.

The White House is at least partially in agreement with this new transparency effort. This morning’s Washington Post reported that President Obama will sign an executive order today that will put Vice President Biden in charge of an 11-member oversight board -- very similar to the RAT Board -- to address federal agency waste and fraud. We won’t know until the EO is released whether the president will seek to modernize agency reporting methods by improving data standards as well. UPDATE: here's the EO.

Our executive director Ellen Miller will be testifying tomorrow on federal financial transparency before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which Rep. Issa chairs. While we are still looking at the details of the DATA Act he introduced today, its broad outlines make a lot of sense. Agencies need to be motivated to fix their reporting systems and follow common reporting methods. And there's new funding to support this particular government transparency effort, an ongoing issue that I wrote about here as part of the #savethedata campaign. There’s a lot more to come.

Here’s the legislation.

The DATA Act