Sunlight Foundation

Grading the States on Disclosure

Campaign Disclosure Project, a collaboration of the UCLA School of Law, the Center for Government Studies, and the California Voter Foundation, just released their fifth-annual nationwide study that grades and ranks each state on their level of campaign disclosure.  The study, found that, over the past five years, states have made great strides in increasing electronic filing of campaign disclosure reports, leading to new levels of openness and transparency at the state level. Kim Alexander, CVF's president, said that electronic filing has a direct impact on how useful that data is online.  "State disclosure agencies are far more likely to present campaign finance data in ways that allow the public to search, sort, and download the information when disclosure reports are initially filed electronically in a digital format," she said. We at Sunlight obviously agree, and it's the argument we are making to the U.S. Senate.

The study ranks each state in four categories: campaign disclosure laws, electronic filing programs, public access to campaign finance data, and disclosure Web site usability. The report also gives advice on how the states can make improvements. States did better in the disclosure law and Web site usability categories, with 45 passing and five failing in each, according to their press release. Thirty passed in the electronic filing category while 20 failed. Thirty-six states passed in the data accessibility category and 14 failed.

In the 2008 assessment, 40 states earned a passing grade and ten failed. Twenty-four states earned grades in the A or B range, up from just two awarded five years ago. Thirty-six states have improved their grades since 2003 and 26 improved over last year's assessment. The driving force behind the improvements has been the increase in the number of states requiring that candidates file disclosure reports electronically. Twenty-four states now require both statewide and legislative candidates to file electronically, up from twelve in 2003. In all, 42 states permit candidates to file electronically, 30 of which require electronic filing by some candidates.

Washington State is at the head of the class by earning an A in this year's study, as well as being ranking first in each of the five studies.  Also receiving top grades this year were California and Michigan. Tennessee is the most improved state over the past five years, while Montana improved the most over the past year.

The Pew Charitable Trusts supported the study.

A Researcher’s Paradise

Sure the temperature is rising in D.C. but it's like Christmas morning for public policy geeks when groups like the non-profit Center for Governmental Studies (CGS) launch something like PolicyArchive.org.

CGS says that the site is the "largest online repository of public policy research in the world." And it's all at your fingertips for free! Before the launch of this, online policy research could be quite burdensome, requiring the researcher to navigate through multiple Web sites that use various formats. CGS' goal is to change all that by collecting policy papers from a "wide range of nonprofit, educational, governmental, private and international think tanks and research organizations" on 306 subtopics. The site currently has available 12,000 policy documents from over 220 think tanks, policy shops and other research organizations. A full listing of contributing sources can be found here.

The site doesn't just upload the reports, they use the best of easy-to-use technology by providing summaries and synopses, indexing, and an internal search engine, among other devises and tools. And this is just the beginning. They have plans for a second version of the site that will include online communities, user ratings and reviews and other neat features.  I see they have only a few reports from the Congressional Research Service, so I hope to connect them with OpenCRS.com. Seems like there's a good synergy there. Very useful stuff.