Sunlight Foundation

Earmark transparency unwound the omnibus

Slate's Dave Weigel has a really interesting take on why the omnibus spending bill just stalled in the Senate:

The omnibus spending bill died in the Senate last night, and the death was a long time coming. It started to bleed in 2006, when a series of rule changes and the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act were passed, opening up the process by which bills were marked up to public scrutiny.

...

The increasing transparency of the earmark process was going to make it tougher for Republicans to support this bill and get away with it. There is nothing -- literally, nothing -- that currently motivates most Republicans to send money back home.

The more transparent the process became the more difficult it has become for critics of government to lob their bombs at spending while simultaneously bringing home the bacon for their state. It becomes a whole lot more clear as to why Sens. Ted Stevens and Robert Byrd put a secret hold on the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act after seeing what transparency hath wrought.

Weigel also gives a good explanation as to why transparency is important in this instance:

It's extremely important that earmarking has become a more transparent process, and that it's now easy to call out members for their requests before bills are voted on. Look at the context, though. Earmarks are only the easiest way to nail members for doing what has never really been controversial -- appropriating.

Of course, the irony in this whole story is that the Obama administration is now in a pickle over funding the government--Secretary Gates went so far as to state that a defeat of the omnibus would harm national security--brought about by a federal spending transparency bill that was one of the chief accomplishments of Obama's short Senate career. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act is also popularly known as the Coburn-Obama bill.

72 Hours for Defense Appropriation Bill

Will defense spending be combined with other bills?

Last week, Congress spent $1.1 trillion tax dollars by combining six pieces of appropriations ("spending") legislation into one 1,000+ page "minibus" bill and passing it with almost no public disclosure or debate.  In fact, the bill was available to the public online for less than 24 hours.

Before December 18th, Congress will be taking up the last remaining 2010 appropriations bill: Defense.  If history is any lesson, Congress will likely try to cram different pieces of legislation into this final bill, and these new bills will be those that were unable to pass previously on their own.  If the new bills are included in the Defense appropriation bill at the last minute, the public won't know what's going on until after the bill is passed.

It's imperative that we have the ability to read the bill online not only before it's passed, but before it's debated, so we can call our representatives while there's still time to have an impact on what they spend our money on.

The craziest part of this whole thing (Capitol Hill finds these things to be "normal") is that the legislation Congress will try to insert may not have anything to do with defense. Raising the nation's debt limit and various health care reforms are two possible inclusions.  By "drafting" behind the Defense bill their chance of passing Congress increases.

And while debt limit and health care reform provisions are at least being discussed in the media, it is the laws we can't see, that have never been debated in the open, that are the most dangerous threat.

Example: the Commodity Futures Modernization Act that was slipped into an omnibus bill back in 2000.  The text was only available for 24 hours and its inclusion in the omnibus was only known for 4 minutes before final consideration.  The passage of the Act not only created the "Enron loophole" but a market of unregulated derivatives which contributed to near economic collapse in late 2008.

Last week, as Congress dropped and passed the minibus appropriations bill, the ridiculousness of not making the bill available online for 72 hours was frustrating and disappointing. Even for the team here at the Sunlight Foundation, who were watching very closely, the $1.1 trillion minibus bill had passed before we could do so much as send an email alert!

It was perhaps most distressing because we now KNOW Congress can make major legislation available for 72 hours before it's debated; we've seen them do it throughout the health care debate. Appropriations don't get the same public pressure as health care so our representatives decided not to give us time to go through the massive spending bill - which added up to be more spending than the Stimulus package.

This week, Congress has a chance to redeem themselves with the one remaining spending bill of the year, and we'll be demanding they get it right.

Post by Jake Brewer with contributions from Noah Kunin.

Image credit by id-iom

Omnibus Bill Thwarts Transparency, Accountability

Regardless of what happens to the Omnibudgetbusterblusterbus bill -- sorry, my fingers slipped -- the Omnibus spending bill (made searchable by our friends at the Heritage Foundation), it's fair to say that citizen oversight of Congress (and congressional oversight of Congress, for whatever that's worth) took a shot to the chin today. The Hill's Alex Bolton reports that the bill's 3,565 pages contain somewhere between 8,983 earmarks (according to Taxpayers for Common Sense), 9,200 earmarks (according to a Senate staffer) and 11,402 earmarks (according to Heritage's excellent Ominibuster blog). There are hundreds of new earmarks previously undisclosed--115 worth $117 million in the previously "earmark free" Homeland Security bill--that have been "airdropped" in at the last minute.

Rep. Marsha Blackburn just noted on C-Span (I'm watching as I type) that the bill weighs in at a hefty 35 pounds when printed. Members have only a few hours to digest all that paper before voting. The bill will appropriate something like hundreds of billions of dollars in funds. In what other arena of life do you make such momentous decisions with so little time to think? "Rush into that subprime mortgage," "buy that stock of a company you'd never heard of before," "a week is plenty of time to find out if someone is worth marrying," -- thus does our Congress decide how to spend our money. This is primarily a failure of the majority (regardless of which party is in the majority--the Republicans were equally opaque) and of leadership, which prefers to dump a monstrosity of a bill--stitched together behind closed doors--on their colleagues with no time for debate, and no time for their constituents to make their opinions known.

Read more