Completeness

When the government publishes spending data, certain data fields are mandatory. These requirements are spelled out in the USASpending.gov data dictionary. This required information generally refers to details of the agency obligating the money or the recipient's identity and location. Since our last report, the number of obligations with completeness errors has gone down quite a bit, falling from a high of 66% of all measured obligations in 2010 to 26% in 2011.

Fiscal YearSpending Failing on CompletenessTotal Spending% Failed
2009$949,832,896,527$1,625,257,115,43958.4%
2010$954,316,971,593$1,437,032,472,47466.4%
2011$428,362,322,077$1,639,826,026,45226.1%

As you can see from the chart below, some fields (and agencies) are more problematic than others. In most cases, there are few problems with the obligated amount, obligation date, recipient name, or agency code. Many of the problems are centered around geographic information regarding the recipient, such as recipient county, city, and congressional district, as well as the place of performance field (generally where the money ends up, even if the grantee is in another location). Each column in the diagram represents a field in the data released by USASpending.gov. You can move your cursor over each cell for more details.

Completeness of Federal Direct Assistance Reporting By Required Field and Agency

Move your cursor over the diagram for details on each federal spending program.
  • 2009
  • 2010
  • 2011
  •   Failing fields
  •   Passing fields
Selected
Hovered
Agency:
__agency__
Field:
__column__
Dollars misreported:
__val__ (__pct__%)